Johan Bruyneel says that the Astana team’s exclusion from the the 2008 Tour de France is just politics, and the team is the victim of a continuing struggle between the Union Cycliste Internationale and Tour de France organizer Amaury Sport Organision.
I say disingenuous, Johann.
Astana left the Tour last year under the cloud of Vinokourov’s doping scandal, and the ASO says the team can’t be trusted. I’d have to agree. The only caveat I have is that no team on the Tour can be trusted. Does anyone out there actually think that Rasmussen is the lone Rabobank rider to have doped? (yes, yes, I know it wasn’t “proven” he doped, but come on)
However, Bruyneel has implemented the same anti-doping measures on the new Astana team that CSC has been using for a few years, and the team roster barely resembles last year’s. New manager, new riders, new procedures—is Astana really the same team as last year?
With riders like Contador (Winner in 2007), Leipheimer (3rd in 2007 and winner of the 2007 Tour of California), and Klöden (2nd or 3rd in 2006, depending on if you consider Landis the winner), all contenders for the overall in 2008, I wonder if ASO is doing a bit of creative field-clearing for other (hopefully French) riders to take the title? Or are they just tired of Bruyneel managing the winning riders for 8 of the last 9 years? Chances are, with the Astana lineup, he’d have won again.
Tags: Cycling, Sports by Roykirk
No Comments »